AUDIENCE FEEDBACK
We would really love to hear from you our audience about how you feel about our performances. Your reaction to what we do can really help us get better as a musical ensemble. It can also help us more efficiently plan for the future. Our mandate is to present to Victorians and visitors to Victoria high quality, exciting performances of the world’s great choral music. How are we doing, what did you like about our performance, what could we improve? Speak up, we want to hear. Constructive criticism is essential for this organization to meet its goals. However, we do reserve the right to remove any posts that fuel disrespect, intolerance, lack of empathy or hate. We also reserve the right to remove anonymous posts. We want to hear your views but you should be willing to put your name to them. ________________________________________________________________________________
My brother performed the Mass in C in New York with his choir last year, and told me it was terrific fun for him to sing. I hope it was for all of you. If not, you sure fooled me! I saw enormous excitement and expression on faces and in bodies up there on the risers. At times, I imagined myself up there with you, but I was so grateful to be getting the full effect of the work as an audience member, I felt quite content and present in that role. I brought my friend Vanessa with me; it was her birthday. She enjoyed the show too.
So. Thank you for spending all of those Monday nights in a chilly church, drilling and re-drilling all of those tricky misereres and modulations, entrances and cutoffs, fugues and fragments, pianissimos and fortissimos. As an insider, knowing what was re"choir"ed makes it all the sweeter for me, but I could hear the depth of appreciation in the swells of "civilian" applause all around me. What you vibrated into the air last night was a gift of energy to the universe, and I know it travelled far beyond the walls of the auditorium.
With Gratitude and Warmth,
Mollie Kaye
Generally the orchestra did not overpower the choir but of course I would have liked to hear the choir even more prominent – could they be amplified in the future as well? I know some of this is the acoustics of the UVic auditorium.
The Spectre’s Bride opened the second half of the program and although I enjoyed it very much, I left feeling frustrated and saddened that, knowing how much work went into this production on the part of the choir, one could barely hear them! I had the perfect seat: dead centre, main floor, 10 rows back. No problem with that. The problem was the size, or rather the volume, of the orchestra. (I’ve attended other concerts by the VPC and when one can hear them, it is truly a wonderful sound. Rich, well balanced for the most part, and well rehearsed.) Although most of the text of this piece was sung by a narrator and the choir merely repeated what the narrator sang, it would have been nice to be able to hear the choir that got top billing on the program. There were times when it was even difficult to hear the soloists, also due to the volume of the orchestra. I heard this comment from other audience members as well.
Everything considered, it was an enjoyable evening. I just wish Simon had reigned in the orchestra so the choir could have been heard.
That one took my breath away. Because Murphy is here arguing, not for art, but for religion. What, after all, is a "timeless masterpiece?" Has the man never been to Stratford, to witness the endless interpretations, many of them good, of William Shakespeare's plays? Does the strength of art not lie precisely in its capacity to be endlessly reinterpreted, made real and immediate for audiences across centuries and cultures? Its "timelessness" consists of its almost infinite adaptability, not its persistence as one thing while history and culture eddy around its vast, immoveable bulk. The latter isn't art--it's just another version of that vulgar notion of God that's causing so much trouble. It stems from the self-same desperate clinging to the authority and stability and order that totalitarians promise. It is founded on fear and self-deception, and there is no shortage of politicians and preachers to exploit both for their own ends.
Samson Agonistes, John Milton's poem upon which Handel based his work, is only intelligible to us today because we recognize the emotions and the images that it conjures up: the heroic representative of a people, captured, blinded and enslaved, who sacrifices himself in order to kill his enemies, delivering his people from the "Philistian yoke" and thus carrying out the will of God. In a place called Gaza. Attempting to discern his all-too-human psychology in the poetry, we might well develop a different, and deeper, insight into the mind of a suicide bomber, or a young kid at Vimy, for that matter, fighting the war to end all wars. Battles are at this very moment raging over Samson's grave. We can be stirred by this poem for numerous reasons, centuries after it was written--but not if we treat it as holy writ, timeless and unchanging, and wait for it to be interpreted for us by imperious clerks, high priests and newspaper columnists. The letter killeth.
Rex Murphy trashes the Victoria production of Handel's Samson oratorio without having seen it (Vandalizing A Timeless Masterpiece -- April 7). Well, I did. While the staging would not have been my choice, to dismiss it as mere agitprop is nonsense.
Folks who stayed away missed an impressive, highly professional celebration of Handel's great work in a production that merited not one of the misleading denunciations from a continent away. Poor Handel and John Milton deserve more thoughtful media friends.
Globe and Mail, Letters to the Editor April 10, 2007
Tonight, there will be the final presentation of Samson. I urge you, Reader of this post page, that if you have not yet attended the Vic.Phil. Choir’s production of this gorgeous work of Handel, to go down to the theatre tonight and wrap yourselves in the aura of an evening that you will never forget. I also urge those who have posted negative comments, especially those of you who have not yet seen the performance, to do likewise.
I have been steeped in a love of classical music all my life though I had not heard Samson prior to attending opening night. My reaction to this production? I was transfixed. How I wished that the performance would not end. The magnificent soloists (realise that the lead, our very own tenor, Ken Lavigne, can equal the best in the world), the finely honed orchestra and the simple, striking set. produced a triumph for the Vic. Phil. Choir. I do fear though that, once the final curtain falls, Samson will remain as only a memory unless a recording be made. Recorded in DVD the viewer would see soloists who so believably reflected their anguished emotions as they sang, the viewer would look at the impressive set as a background to their wonderful sound made the performance even more of a treat.
And now to the feeling of ‘political correctness’ that the production has caused to rise. I am not going to get into a discussion on this except to say that, in my opinion, this sort of production is important. To quote an eloquent friend …”What is Art supposed to do? Why, question, involve, make people uncomfortable, move them, make them think. Art must be free from political correctness and be able to present music with fresh eyes.”
So, dear post page Reader, go down to the theatre tonight and wrap yourselves in the aura of an evening that you will never ever forget.
GIVE YOURSELF A TREAT!
Simon is a lot of fun to watch and is an excellant conductor, always very clear in conveying what he wants. The orchestra was superb. The choir were great. This is a big work with great demands on vocal stamina (big sound!). A few burbles here and there, but certainly nothing too noticeable. I was impressed by the courageously forceful entrances where there was no accompaniment. I agreed with some one else who noted a couple of theatrically bobbing heads, one in the soprano section. A little distracting. Great energy throughout, whew! I was a little disappointed in the soloists. I noted a number of pitch problems, especially early on. But over all, well done. Bruce Kelly was particularly wonderful. Lighting was a little poor on front stage right, perhaps though that was intended. I know the work that went into this, please give yourselves a big atta-boy and thank you so very much for an entertaining afternoon.
Now if the rest of choral Victoria could only get the kind of coverage and reviewing VPC gets, wouldn't that be great?
Janice Campbell
And setting it where and when you did, while obviously dramatic, if not provocative, was also very powerful. It gave a new and interesting perspective to the story - and gave one pause for thought.
I am sorry - but not surprised - to learn you have been subjected to threats, but good for you to be willing to be daring, so stick to your artistic vision.
I will "weigh in" on the controversy about Irgun Zwei Leumi. I think great music, and the text of Samson, based on Milton, are always relevant and do not require "updates." Perhaps simple "drapery" costumes would have been better. Yes, there is an historical link between the days of the Israelites and the Philistines, and more recent times, but it really adds nothing to the music. The idea of a semi-staged performance is definitely a good one, and we found the production very worthwhile despite the anachronistic staging.
We look forward to the "Spectre's Bride" and further Victoria Philharmonic events.
I agree that the time shift and terrorist theme was daring and a huge risk on the part of the Music Director, but what is life if not taking chances and putting oneself on the line for the sake of art? How does humanity move forward if we only maintain the status quo and never attempt something creative... we certainly would not be enjoying Samson today if Handel had not been creative, innovative and original in his approach to composing such a piece.
I find it extremely useful to attempt to bring modern day relevance to music from the past. Why not? For starters, it stirs the head and the heart – even though you may disagree with the premise or the final product, look how it’s got people talking about a topic they are passionate about.
I personally do not fault Simon Capet for his innovative approach. I congratulate him. And congratulations to all on a very powerful and moving concert!
In Samson and in the world today we see rage as has been well illustrated by some of the messages to this page. We see also see the avoidant disinterest of the average citizen of the western nations numbed by the nightly newscasts from CNN.
Samson rages at Delilah and exacts revenge upon her people but we the audience are in the end entreated to hope for peace and unity.
So it can be amongst the peoples of the world today, if we just let it. We must understand the anger of the traumatised and be patient with it, but Simon Capet must be congratulated for using the emotional language of music to search for a solution to our continuing enemity to our fellow human beings.
kudos to everyone involved.
Irena
The concert in Victoria was exhilirating. I will now investigate more of his current recordings. The Victoria Philharmonic choir was superb. I look forward to more concerts. Thank you for giving Victoria the opportunity to hear such wonderful music

BRAVO!
So why wasn't the concert hall packed? The advertising was good, the programme great, and the reputation of the VPC well established, and then, of course, there was Nancy Argenta - so where was everyone?
May 1, 2008 | Fran Cudlipp (Locust2@telus.net)